Page 66 - BCM May 2024

D.C. WATCH

The Credit Card Fee Settlements

Recent developments have been positive, but things continue to evolve.

n a development that could signi cantly alter the worse, position.
I landscape for small businesses, the recent settlement ese concerns amplify a broader debate about the
involving Visa, Mastercard and a coalition of merchants e ectiveness of market-driven settlements in tackling
has drawn attention from a broad spectrum, including entrenched nancial practices within the credit card
policymakers and bowling proprietors. Announced on processing industry. While Visa and Mastercard have
March 26, this pivotal agreement inter- positioned the agreement as a meaningful step toward al-
sects with the ongoing discussions around leviating merchant costs, skeptics within the industry call
the bipartisan Credit Card Competition for more substantial and lasting reforms that can only be
Act, a legislative e ort closely monitored achieved through legislative action, rather than temporary
by BPAA and other industry groups. For concessions.
bowling proprietors, the implications are e settlement adds a new layer to the conversation
BRANDON profound, potentially a ecting not only around the Credit Card Competition Act. Although the
settlement provides immediate fee relief, its impact on
pro t margins but also the dynamics of
PALUMBO credit card processing. legislative momentum is debatable. Some lawmakers
e bill remains a potential disruptor of perceive it as con rmation that market-led solutions can
the de facto duopoly over credit card processing. Led by work, potentially reducing the push for regulatory change.
Senator Roger Marshall (R-KA) and Senator Dick Durbin Conversely, industry groups and some legislators argue
(D-IL), it mandates that banks o er merchants a choice that the settlement’s limitations highlight the urgent need
between at least two una liated networks for processing for comprehensive legislation to ensure lasting fairness
credit transactions. is seeks to reduce the dominance of and relief in credit card processing fees. is situation
the two credit card giants (Visa and MasterCard), foster- suggests that the settlement might invigorate further
ing competition that aims to lower transaction costs for debate, drawing attention to the limitations of voluntary
businesses. concessions and strengthening the case for legislative
With the settlement now in play, the importance of action.
this bill for bowling center transactions has signi cantly e settlement o ers both opportunities and challenges
increased, highlighting a critical moment to consider its for bowling proprietors. On one hand, the reduction in
implications and outcomes. swipe fees heralds potential operational cost savings,
Visa and Mastercard’s agreement with merchants which might allow for lower consumer prices or increased
marks a potentially transformative moment in the land- pro tability. However, the transient nature of the fee
scape of credit card interchange fees, promising adjust- caps and the potential for future fee increases introduce a
ments that could alleviate some nancial pressures faced level of uncertainty. is underscores the importance for
by small-business owners. At the heart of the settlement proprietors to stay informed and proactive, as the evolving
is a commitment to reduce swipe fees by at least 4 basis credit card fee landscape is poised to signi cantly impact
points for three years, along with a freeze on fee increases business strategies and consumer pricing.
beyond their levels at the end of 2023 for a subsequent e ongoing debate over credit card swipe fees high-
ve-year period. is structured approach aims to provide lights a broader contention between market-driven
immediate nancial relief to merchants. settlements and the need for legislative intervention. For
However, despite the settlement’s promise, reactions proprietors, this issue transcends a mere policy debate,
from various industry groups have been mixed, re ecting carrying direct implications for their operations.
deeper concerns about its breadth and depth. Critiques As the landscape continues to shift, it becomes increas-
have focused on the modest scope of the fee reductions ingly important for these business owners to engage in
and the temporary nature of the caps, suggesting they advocacy e orts and remain active participants in the dis-
might not o er a comprehensive solution to the high course. By doing so, they can ensure their voices are heard
costs burdening merchants. Some industry representa- and contribute to creating a more equitable and competi-
tives argue that while any decrease in fees is welcome, the tive environment for credit card processing, directly in u-
changes fall short of addressing the systemic issues that encing the future of their businesses in a positive manner.
underpin the signi cant expenses merchants face related
to credit card transactions. Moreover, there is apprehen- Brandon Palumbo is a senior associate with Michael
sion that once the agreed-upon period ends, fees could Best Strategies. BPAA works with Michael Best Strategies
escalate once again, leaving merchants in a similar, if not on federal and state advocacy.

64 • BCM • MAY 2024 www.bcmmag.com

064_DC_Watch_0524.indd 64 4/15/24 8:14 PM